Calculating with the future

As an independent professional association with over 7,000 mathematicians from the insurance and finance industry, we ensure the professional expertise of our members. 

Skip Slider
The DAV advocates for a legal clarification in the AI Act to distinguish classical statistical methods from the AI definition.
06/11/2026 - Actuarial Data Science

With Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (hereinafter: the AI Act), the European Union has, for the first time, established a horizontal legal framework for AI systems. The European Commission’s guidelines on the definition of an AI system, set out in Communication C(2025) 5053 final of 29 July 2025, are intended to provide practical guidance for the interpretation of Article 3(1) of the AI Act. From an actuarial perspective, however, considerable room for interpretation remains, particularly with regard to classical statistical methods such as linear and logistic regression as special cases of Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), and GLMs as special cases of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). These methods have formed part of the standard methodological toolkit in actuarial science for the past three decades and have proven their value in decision-critical applications such as pricing and underwriting. Actuaries receive extensive training in their use and thereby help ensure a high degree of explainability, transparency, and freedom from discrimination.

The German Association of Actuaries (DAV) takes this remaining interpretative uncertainty as an opportunity to set out its professional position: classical statistical methods should not be classified as AI systems within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the AI Act. This statement substantiates that position on the basis of the defining characteristics of AI systems themselves and calls upon the European Commission to provide a clear and explicit clarification.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugriff auf diesen Inhalt zu bekommen. false

An overview

Events
Events for actuaries

Together with our associations and partners, we organize important events for actuaries throughout the year: Networking, learning and training together and celebrating as one. Here you will find an overview of all events, from congresses to further training and examinations. Would you like to be there? Book your next event directly!

Wissen
The knowledge of actuaries

Discover our large knowledge database for actuaries: everything that actuaries finalize in the expert committees of their associations is published here and thus made available not only to the actuarial community, but also to the public. Because we see our motto “We calculate with the future” as a social mission.

Magazine
Current publications

The “Magazines” section includes the publications of the members' magazine “DAV Journal” (formerly “Der Aktuar”), which covers specific specialist topics and association events. The second is the magazine for the interested public, “Aktuar Aktuell”. All articles of “Aktuar Aktuell” published since 2024 as well as the complete issues are free to read.

Newsroom
Press and politics

Are you a member of the press, journalist or political or institutional representative looking for up-to-date information, pictures or contacts? Would you like to find out more about actuaries or do you need background information and interview opportunities on topics such as insurance, occupational pensions and old-age provision? Then the Newsroom is the right place for you.

News

Skip Slider
The DAV advocates for a legal clarification in the AI Act to distinguish classical statistical methods from the AI definition.
06/11/2026 - Actuarial Data Science

With Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (hereinafter: the AI Act), the European Union has, for the first time, established a horizontal legal framework for AI systems. The European Commission’s guidelines on the definition of an AI system, set out in Communication C(2025) 5053 final of 29 July 2025, are intended to provide practical guidance for the interpretation of Article 3(1) of the AI Act. From an actuarial perspective, however, considerable room for interpretation remains, particularly with regard to classical statistical methods such as linear and logistic regression as special cases of Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), and GLMs as special cases of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). These methods have formed part of the standard methodological toolkit in actuarial science for the past three decades and have proven their value in decision-critical applications such as pricing and underwriting. Actuaries receive extensive training in their use and thereby help ensure a high degree of explainability, transparency, and freedom from discrimination.

The German Association of Actuaries (DAV) takes this remaining interpretative uncertainty as an opportunity to set out its professional position: classical statistical methods should not be classified as AI systems within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the AI Act. This statement substantiates that position on the basis of the defining characteristics of AI systems themselves and calls upon the European Commission to provide a clear and explicit clarification.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugriff auf diesen Inhalt zu bekommen. false